The Truth About Negative Ion Bracelets — Do Ionic Wristbands Work?
Does a negative ion bracelet actually work to generate negative ions, how are they made and are there any studies or proof to back up their claimed benefits?
This article has whether ionizing wristbands are a hoax, a possible explanation as to why they may be beneficial, and a far better alternative if you are interested in improving your health with negative ions.
What Is a Negative Ion Bracelet?
Distinct from the more popular yet questionable ‘balance bracelets’, made by companies like Power Balance, an ionic bracelet is a band worn around your wrist that is supposed to generate negative ions.
Ionic Balance, Dr-Ion, IonLoop, One Ion, Purlife and Power Ionics are some of main ion energy wristbands and they are commonly used by people who play golf and other sports.
The beneficial effects of negatively charged ions are well-established and true anion generators, like this small and portable one I have, can produce significant amounts of them.
The important question here is: do nano ion bands produced detectable ions, if so how and how much, and is this a good way to improve your health?
What are Ionic Bracelets Made of?
Most negative ion wristbands, like this one on Amazon, are made from silicon combined with special minerals, like powdered tourmaline or germanium. Some claim to be infused with a combination of ion-generating minerals, though rarely do they list exactly what these are.
The most common minerals used in ion power bracelets, after tourmaline, would be germanium, zeolite and titanium as these are also considered ionic minerals. Tourmaline, and specifically black tourmaline, is generally recognized as the most powerful of these though.
While there are some quite beautiful looking mineral bracelet designs, look for the manufacturer to highlight that they use germanium or tourmaline at a minimum, and preferably black tourmaline, for there to be any ion generation.
Do Ion Bracelets Actually Generate Negative Ions?
Tourmaline, as a gemstone and in powdered form, is known to generate a weak electrical charge and far infrared radiation. Its ability to produce significant anions that the human body can utilize is less well-established.
While powdered tourmaline, used in ionic bands and other products like ion-generating clothing and sheets, has been demonstrated to generate negative ions, it does seem to require pressure being applied to it, or for it to be heated in some way.
It’s theorized that any ions produced with tourmaline are due to either the piezoelectric effect (when a substance generates an electrical charge due to pressure) or the pyroelectric effect (when a material generates a temporary voltage when heated).
While testing a ionic bracelet with an ion counter does show a reasonable negative ion count in videos like this, could this reading be due to the tourmaline infused band being scrunched together?
If so, would the mild pressure usually applied by wearing an ionizing bracelet be enough to generate many negatively-charged ions?
If it is rather the pyroelectric effect at work in ionic wristbands, is there really enough heat being generated in the powdered tourmaline within the silicon band just by wearing it around the wrist?
More concerning is this information from a powdered tourmaline manufacturer that it produces both negatively-charged ions and positively-charged ions in roughly equal amounts.
If this is the case, then the beneficial properties of any negative ions produced could be largely countered by the extra positive ions.
Scientific Studies and Proof
If negative ion wristband manufacturers want to be taken seriously, they would do well to produce much more proof of the claims they make.
While the Ionic Balance and Power Ionics sites do state that their products have been tested with ion counters and list the results, there is no independent verification that I could find.
Videos of readings from ion counters, while the product is being worn on the wrist, should be a bare minimum. Yet these are not on the websites of most brands of ion wristbands.
Another counter reading at face level while wearing an ionic wristband would be even more helpful, as this is the real amount of ions a person would be receiving during daily use.
Proper studies on ionizing jewelry would be even better and, while obviously susceptible to the placebo effect, would go a long way to countering claims that ion bands are just a scam.
The only research studies I could find on the benefits of ‘electron bracelets’ were on a couple of the manufacturer’s websites with small sample sizes and not from a peer-reviewed journal.
Conversely, this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on Pubmed found no benefit in treating muscle or joint pain with ‘ionized’ wrist bracelets (unfortunately they don’t list the type used).
Are Negative Ion Bracelets a Hoax?
It’s important to differentiate between the ‘balance bands’ or ‘energy bracelets’, that purport to use holographic technology, biofield science, harmonizing bioelectric frequencies, or other kinds of pseudoscience-sounding terms, and those products claiming specifically to generate negative ions.
The makers of the Power Balance bracelet for instance were forced to admit in a court case brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that: ‘In our advertising we stated that Power Balance wristbands improved your strength, balance and flexibility. We admit that there is no credible scientific evidence that supports our claims…’
In deciding whether ion bracelets are a fake or a scam, the question is do they actually generate enough negative ions to be beneficial?
Or are they simply linking their product to the beneficial effects of negatively-charged ions, without any proof that they produce enough of them to work?
Many commentators believe that latter and see all kind of ‘energy bands’, ‘power bracelets’ and ‘nano ion wristbands’ as a hoax.
So Do Ionic ‘Electron’ Bracelets Work?
Testing of ionizing bracelets, pressed against a negative ion meter do show ionic activity. The highest I’ve seen is a reading of 4421 negative ions. This would be difficult to fake.
Just how far did these negative ions emit from the ionizing wristband though? Only breathing negative ions has been scientifically proven to be beneficial and your wrist is usually a fair distance from your nose.
A far better option would be to wear one of the new generation ionic pendants around your neck. There’s much more on negative ion necklace benefits here. Any one of those 8 would work far better than a tourmaline or germanium bracelet.
Claims that negative ions can enter directly into your bloodstream from wearing ionic jewelry on your skin have never been proven. Additionally, the ion-generating minerals are within the silicon in itself, not a coating on the outside.
Personally, I think the many benefits claimed by ‘electron’ bracelet brands, based on negative ions, are very suspect at best.
While I hesitate to say they are an outright scam or fake, the ion generation is simply too low to have much effect, unless perhaps you walked around all day with it under your nose.
Despite these concerns, far too many people report positive effects once they start wearing ionic bracelets, in verified customer reviews and on popular forums and health sites, for them to all be fakes in my opinion.
Many also point out that those criticizing ion bands have never actually tried wearing them. They may work in ways that are not yet fully understood.
Skeptical and scientifically-minded people will counter that this is purely the power of the placebo effect. I’d suggest that if, and it’s a big if, these ‘energy bracelets’ or ‘power bands’ do work in some way, then far-infrared radiation would be a more likely cause than negative ions.
While the old balance tests are easy to fake, and wild reports of ionized bracelets curing every kind of ailment and disease are clearly overblown, far-infrared radiation has its own effects and should at least be considered as a possible factor.
Despite this view, I don’t personally own an ion bracelet and there’s a good reason why.
A high density negative ion generator produces so many millions more negative ions that ionic bracelets, even if they do work in some way, don’t really stand up to comparison.
What Is Better Than an Ionic Wristband?
Compare even the best ionizing bracelet demonstration of 4421 negative ions produced, with a true anion generator, like this excellent portable one I have, with a verified output of 20,000,000 ions per second.
If you don’t want to wear a personal air purifier then another great way to get the benefits of negative ions is to keep one on your desk at work or on a table in your home.
Most people spend a lot of time in the same places in their home or office each day and the far higher level of negative ions generated by a corona discharge ionizer positioned nearby would far outperform even the best ion bracelet.
Just 30 minutes a day of exposure to a high-powered negative ion generator has been shown to have some dramatic effects, particularly on your mood and sense of well-being.
Ionic bands are an interesting idea but at best they are quite weak ion producers and there really isn’t enough evidence to show they actually work at all.
Do you have an opinion as to whether a negative ion bracelet can have any beneficial properties or do you think they’re a scam?
I’d be particularly interested to hear from people who have personally worn a Power Ionics band, Ion Loop, Fusion IONZ, or one of the other popular types of ‘power bracelets’ and ionic wristbands that claim to generate negative ions.
This article may contain affiliate links to products I've researched and recommend. As an Amazon Associate I may earn from qualifying purchases at no cost to the consumer.